Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state

From: Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org>
To: dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould)
Cc: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian), vadim(at)krs(dot)ru, vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su, t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Date: 1998-06-14 03:07:35
Message-ID: 13699.15991.447162.924830@web0.speakeasy.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I've been trying to use them in my patches as well, maily for
consistency as its something I'd never do myself.  I'll gladly
stop though.

On Sat, 13 June 1998, at 19:59:12, David Gould wrote:

> Ok, I won't add them. I'm not taking them out if I see them though ;-). 
> 
> > Sure, but braces don't help you either.  This is just as legal:
> > 
> > 	if (condition);
> > 	{
> > 		dosomething();
> > 	}
> 
> True enough, but I think less likely to happen. 

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Vadim MikheevDate: 1998-06-14 06:35:31
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Previous:From: David GouldDate: 1998-06-14 02:59:12
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group