On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 20:45 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> About that plugins directory ($libdir/plugins) ... I don't think we
> really got that to work sensibly. I don't remember the original
> discussion, but I have seen a number of explanations offered over the
> years. It's not clear who decides what to put in there (plugin
> packager, DBA?), how to put it there (move it, copy it, symlink it? --
> no support in pgxs), and based on what criteria.
> It would seem to be much more in the spirit of things to simply list
> allowed plugins in a GUC variable, like
> some_clever_name_here = $libdir/this, $libdir/that
Here is a patch, with some_clever_name = user_loadable_libraries.
There are obviously some conflict/transition issues with using
user_loadable_libraries vs the plugins directory. I have tried to
explain the mechanisms in the documentation, but there are other choices
possible in some situations.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2013-01-15 12:53:21|
|Subject: Re: pg_ctl idempotent option|
|Previous:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2013-01-15 11:36:25|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compile without warning with gcc's -Wtype-limits,