| From: | Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp |
| Cc: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance |
| Date: | 1998-03-16 08:15:08 |
| Message-ID: | 13580.57158.671556.881613@abraxas.scene.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
hmm.. well until the grammar gets fixed, create table c(c _char)
should work, as _typename is the typename from an array of that type.
Although I don't see what advantages a character array has over text?
On Mon, 16 March 1998, at 15:20:36, t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp wrote:
> Please do not remove char2! Some users uses it for making an array of
> char.
>
> create table c(c char2[]);
>
> Seems strange? Yes. Actually what he wanted to do was:
>
> test=> create table c(c char[]);
> ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "["
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
> t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | t-ishii | 1998-03-16 08:27:17 | Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance |
| Previous Message | Vadim B. Mikheev | 1998-03-16 08:09:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables? |