On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 17:37 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> If we make the postgres database undroppable, unrenamable, and
> strictly read-only, I will happily support a proposal to consider it a
> system object. Until then, it's no more a system object than the
> public schema - which, you will note, \dn has no compunctions about
> displaying, even without S.
Good point. What about the other suggestion about only displaying
databases by default that you can connect to?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Stephen Frost||Date: 2013-01-09 04:38:17|
|Subject: Re: Index build temp files|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2013-01-09 04:32:54|
|Subject: Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make|