Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: bad examples in pg_dump README

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bad examples in pg_dump README
Date: 2013-01-08 03:12:22
Message-ID: 1357614742.19347.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 15:34 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I propose slimming down the pg_dump README, keeping intact the
> > introductory notes and details of the tar format.
> 
> Do we need to keep it at all, really? Certainly the introductory part
> is covered in the main documentation already...

I'd remove it and distribute the remaining information, if any, between
the source code and the man page.




In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2013-01-08 03:16:56
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Patch to fix missing libecpg_compat.lib and libpgtypes.lib.
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2013-01-08 02:58:45
Subject: PL/Python result object str handler

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group