On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 15:34 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I propose slimming down the pg_dump README, keeping intact the
> > introductory notes and details of the tar format.
> 
> Do we need to keep it at all, really? Certainly the introductory part
> is covered in the main documentation already...

I'd remove it and distribute the remaining information, if any, between
the source code and the man page.

In response to

• Re: bad examples in pg_dump README at 2013-01-05 14:34:26 from Magnus Hagander

Responses

• Re: bad examples in pg_dump README at 2013-01-09 02:55:07 from Josh Kupershmidt

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2013-01-08 03:16:56
	Subject: Re: [PATCH] Patch to fix missing libecpg_compat.lib and libpgtypes.lib.
Previous:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2013-01-08 02:58:45
	Subject: PL/Python result object str handler