Re: full table...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Felson <felson123(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: full table...
Date: 2002-08-20 16:20:58
Message-ID: 13557.1029860458@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Felson <felson123(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> I am on 7.0 I am plaing an upgade at the end of the
> week as I am getting a new server to put it on. As for
> rules, there are a number of indexs, and 2 forign key
> rules.

Ah-hah. I bet your problem is the foreign key rules. Make sure you
have indexes on both ends of each foreign-key reference (ie, both the
referencing and referenced columns need indexes). Also, vacuum analyze
both tables. Then start a fresh backend and see if it's any better.
(You need a fresh backend because the plans for foreign-key check
queries are cached.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Felson 2002-08-20 17:12:02 Re: full table...
Previous Message Felson 2002-08-20 16:16:02 Re: full table...