Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Fixes to index pages

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixes to index pages
Date: 2001-02-22 03:49:18
Message-ID: 13541.982813758@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> What happened to our discussion about keeping t_info bit 13 unused??

> I wasn't going to reserve it in the patch. I figured I would make all
> the items/flags match, and if someone wants to reserve it, it is easy to
> do in one place.  I imagine 7.2 is going to be dump/reload anyway so the
> decision can be made during development cycle.  I basically didn't want
> to leave a bit gap and leave it unnamed because it could cause
> confusion.

I object.  Strongly.  You are making a significant change without
discussion --- in fact, contrary to what discussion there has been.
This is not a "trivial cleanup".

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-02-22 03:53:27
Subject: Re: Re: Fixes to index pages
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-02-22 03:22:42
Subject: Re: Re: Fixes to index pages

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group