Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> What happened to our discussion about keeping t_info bit 13 unused??
> I wasn't going to reserve it in the patch. I figured I would make all
> the items/flags match, and if someone wants to reserve it, it is easy to
> do in one place. I imagine 7.2 is going to be dump/reload anyway so the
> decision can be made during development cycle. I basically didn't want
> to leave a bit gap and leave it unnamed because it could cause
I object. Strongly. You are making a significant change without
discussion --- in fact, contrary to what discussion there has been.
This is not a "trivial cleanup".
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-02-22 03:53:27|
|Subject: Re: Re: Fixes to index pages |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-02-22 03:22:42|
|Subject: Re: Re: Fixes to index pages|