On 09/25/2012 12:28:13 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 09/23/2012 08:57:45 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > The attached patch documents the oid column of those
> > system catalogs having an oid.
> Don't use the first version of this patch (oid_doc.patch)
> without discarding the last hunk. The last hunk
> introduces an error by duplicating the
> documentation of the pg_roles.oid column.
> (I am reluctant to post a revised version
> since there's already 3 versions floating
> around representing 2 different approaches
> and no consensus as to which approach, if any, should
> be taken.)
I have figured out how to use the commitfest
pages to track what should be reviewed.
Submitting a corrected version of the very
first patch, which treats the oids as
I am now submitting patches to the commitfest
for review. (I'm not sure how I missed this.)
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-10-02 15:58:57|
|Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2012-10-02 15:08:54|
|Subject: Re: Hash id in pg_stat_statements|