On 09/27/2012 11:02:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rather, the problem is that the server might know about some newer
> lexical feature, and so might the application, but if libpq is behind
> the times then it's broken.
If the application knows about the newer feature and wants
to use it, is it unreasonable to ask the application
be linked against a newer libpq?
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2012-09-27 18:34:16|
|Subject: Re: Oid registry|
|Previous:||From: Karl O. Pinc||Date: 2012-09-27 18:02:14|
|Subject: Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c|