Excerpts from Tomas Vondra's message of mié sep 26 12:25:58 -0300 2012:
> Dne 26.09.2012 16:51, Jeff Janes napsal:
> > I think forking it off to to another value would be better. If you
> > are an autovacuum worker which is just starting up and so getting its
> > initial stats, you can tolerate a stats file up to
> > "autovacuum_naptime
> > / 5.0" stale. If you are already started up and are just about to
> > vacuum a table, then keep the staleness at PGSTAT_RETRY_DELAY as it
> > currently is, so as not to redundantly vacuum a table.
> I always thought there's a "no more than one worker per database"
There is no such limitation.
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tomas Vondra||Date: 2012-09-26 15:35:02|
|Subject: Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system|
|Previous:||From: Marko Kreen||Date: 2012-09-26 15:28:41|
|Subject: Re: [9.1] 2 bugs with extensions|