| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Phil Cairns <phil(at)pagaros(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Subject: | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] [Fwd: RE: Build farm on Windows] |
| Date: | 2006-07-29 02:50:01 |
| Message-ID: | 13475.1154141401@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Is there a reason we have to do things in this order? Could we just
> postpone the call to InitializeGUCOptions() for a couple of lines?
Maybe, but I'm disinclined to mess with that. I have a patch that
makes it work like TimeZone, but am having difficulty committing
... looks like that Polish script kiddie is at it again ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-08-15 13:15:27 | [Pgbuildfarm-members] buildfarm failures - manual intervention required |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-07-29 02:18:33 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] [Fwd: RE: Build farm on Windows] |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-29 02:54:57 | Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-29 02:26:08 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_regress breaks on msys |