Re: BUG #6704: ALTER EXTENSION postgis SET SCHEMA leaves dangling relations

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, jeff <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #6704: ALTER EXTENSION postgis SET SCHEMA leaves dangling relations
Date: 2012-08-31 04:47:54
Message-ID: 1346388417-sup-7175@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue ago 30 23:19:12 -0400 2012:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:37:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com writes:
> >>> DROP and CREATE extension appear to work fine, but if you ALTER EXTENSION
> >>> postgis SET SCHEMA foo, it leaves a few relations behind.
>
> >> What it seems to be leaving behind is indexes ... also relation rowtypes.
>
> > Uh, did this get fixed? I can't find a commit related to the fix.
>
> No, it's still an open issue.

Hmm, I think this might be my bug. I will have a look at this; not sure
if I'll be able to do it tomorrow, though (and certainly not during the
weekend).

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rikard Pavelic 2012-08-31 07:32:13 Re: BUG #6489: Alter table with composite type/table
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-08-31 03:19:12 Re: BUG #6704: ALTER EXTENSION postgis SET SCHEMA leaves dangling relations