Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #6729: Install of postgresql-devel for x86_84 and i686 fails

From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: ysharma(at)cymer(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #6729: Install of postgresql-devel for x86_84 and i686 fails
Date: 2012-07-12 20:42:56
Message-ID: 1342125776.18166.32.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Hi,

On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 16:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> writes:
> > It is not a bug, but it might be a missing feature (and I'm not sure
> how
> > to fix it :-) )
> 
> It's fairly common for -devel packages of different architectures to
> conflict.  If you were to try to fix it, you'd likely need the 64-bit
> versions to install their stuff into .../lib64/ not .../lib/.

Well, there lies the problem. My packages push everything
under /usr/pgsql-9.1 , and libs go to /usr/pgsql-9.1/lib. A

> Not sure how practical such a change is at this late date.

What if I build *9.2* with --libdir=/usr/pgsql-9.1/lib64 for x86_64, and
then push 32-bit packages to /usr/pgsql-9.1/lib ?

Regards,
-- 
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Yogesh_SharmaDate: 2012-07-12 20:48:39
Subject: Re: BUG #6729: Install of postgresql-devel for x86_84 and i686 fails
Previous:From: Yogesh_SharmaDate: 2012-07-12 20:41:34
Subject: Re: BUG #6729: Install of postgresql-devel for x86_84 and i686 fails

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group