Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> 2009/12/31 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> Where's the logic to provide a definition of
>> intptr_t if the platform fails to?
> autoconf does that.
Oh, that's what I get for trying to review a patch before absorbing
any caffeine :-( ... I missed that you were relying on a built-in
> That also came out of Bruce's patch. Bruce, can you look at doing
> that? I don't have a machine easily accessible with the right autoconf
> version ATM :(
It's a really bad idea to be committing configure changes without having
personally run the patch through autoconf.
As penance for being too quick to complain, I'll review and commit this
myself. If it works on my old HPUX box, it'll probably work everywhere ;-)
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Gurjeet Singh||Date: 2009-12-31 17:23:37|
|Subject: Re: Re-enabling SET ROLE in security definer functions|
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2009-12-31 17:10:02|
|Subject: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking|