Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_upgrade log files

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade log files
Date: 2012-06-29 17:01:30
Message-ID: 1340989255-sup-4716@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie jun 29 01:04:13 -0400 2012:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> > I propose this patch which echoes the commands to the respective log
> > files.  I would backpatch this to 9.2.
> 
> OK, but the fflush just before fclose seems a bit pointless; fclose
> will do that anyway no?

Bah, yes, thanks.  Pushed with that change.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Nils GorollDate: 2012-06-29 17:07:11
Subject: Update on the spinlock->pthread_mutex patch experimental: replace s_lock spinlock code with pthread_mutex on linux
Previous:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2012-06-29 16:39:15
Subject: Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group