Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jun 26 15:49:59 -0400 2012:
> Robert, all:
> Last I checked, we had a reasonably acceptable patch to use mostly Posix
> Shared mem with a very small sysv ram partition. Is there anything
> keeping this from going into 9.3? It would eliminate a major
> configuration headache for our users.
I don't think that patch was all that reasonable. It needed work, and
in any case it needs a rebase because it was pretty old.
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kohei KaiGai||Date: 2012-06-26 20:36:15|
|Subject: Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-06-26 20:08:48|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lazy hashaggregate when no aggregation is needed|