Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction
Date: 2012-06-22 03:03:31
Message-ID: 1340329520-sup-8669@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of jue jun 21 18:53:06 -0400 2012:
> 
> > I don't know, because I can't see what's changed if you don't send a
> > diff.  It would be fine if you sent a diff between plain text, to
> > illustrate what you mean, even if it's not the actual source code.
> 
> Odd; nobody else seems to have had trouble understanding my post.

It takes a lot more effort, though -- I, for one, would read both
versions in parallel to see what differs (and I'm not Leonardo).  If you
send a patch the differences are immediately obvious (assuming you don't
do anything silly like reflowing the whole paragraph).

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-06-29 00:14:05
Subject: Re: outdated legal notice in SGML docs?
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2012-06-21 22:53:06
Subject: Re: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group