Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction
Date: 2012-06-15 23:24:30
Message-ID: 1339802670.20206.3.camel@sussancws0025 (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 12:37 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Hmmm.  I think we should also say "partitioning", as well as
> "inheritance".  Maybe:
> 
> "Extensive use of table inheritance, such as for tables with many
> partitions, may require raising this setting."

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIONING-CONSTRAINT-EXCLUSION

Looks like we do define it, so that's fine with me.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis


In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2012-06-19 21:16:41
Subject: Re: outdated legal notice in SGML docs?
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2012-06-15 19:37:03
Subject: Re: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group