Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ALTER TABLE OWNER: change indexes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE OWNER: change indexes
Date: 2002-02-24 23:33:07
Message-ID: 13392.1014593587@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Maybe indexes and TOAST tables shouldn't have ownership it all.  (Set
> relowner to 0.)  Since only owners can create these things, there doesn't
> seem to be a point in maintaining ownership.

That's a good thought.  At one time we allowed non-owners to create
indexes on tables, but it was correctly pointed out that this was a
bad idea (think UNIQUE index, or a functional index that always
causes an error...).  I can't see a real good reason for either indexes
or TOAST tables to have a concept of ownership distinct from the parent
table.

psql's \d displays might have some trouble with this, and pg_dump might
get confused too.  But fixing them would be a net improvement in
robustness so it's probably a reasonable thing to do.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2002-02-24 23:34:42
Subject: Basic DOMAIN Support
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-02-24 23:20:09
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE OWNER: change indexes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group