Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove dead ports

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove dead ports
Date: 2012-05-02 17:12:35
Message-ID: 1335978755.29903.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
On ons, 2012-05-02 at 00:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Remove dead ports
> 
> Checking this patch, I noticed that config.guess and config.sub harbor
> most of the remaining references to those platforms, which reminded me:
> don't we usually update those files from autoconf upstream before beta?

Yes, once we know when beta is, we can move on that. ;-)

Btw., I had intentionally kept the uses in ps_status.c and getrusage.c,
because they remain useful in case someone wants to use these files for
reference.  But I guess that's debatable, because we no longer have a
way to prove that those uses actually continue to work.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-05-02 17:15:48
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove dead ports
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2012-05-02 17:06:55
Subject: Re: extending relations more efficiently

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-05-02 17:15:48
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove dead ports
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-05-02 16:50:13
Subject: pgsql: Avoid repeated CLOG access from heap_hot_search_buffer.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group