On ons, 2012-05-02 at 00:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Remove dead ports
> 
> Checking this patch, I noticed that config.guess and config.sub harbor
> most of the remaining references to those platforms, which reminded me:
> don't we usually update those files from autoconf upstream before beta?

Yes, once we know when beta is, we can move on that. ;-)

Btw., I had intentionally kept the uses in ps_status.c and getrusage.c,
because they remain useful in case someone wants to use these files for
reference.  But I guess that's debatable, because we no longer have a
way to prove that those uses actually continue to work.

In response to

• Re: pgsql: Remove dead ports at 2012-05-02 04:31:10 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove dead ports at 2012-05-02 17:15:48 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2012-05-02 17:15:48
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove dead ports
Previous:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2012-05-02 17:06:55
	Subject: Re: extending relations more efficiently

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2012-05-02 17:15:48
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove dead ports
Previous:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2012-05-02 16:50:13
	Subject: pgsql: Avoid repeated CLOG access from heap_hot_search_buffer.