On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 12:48 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Um, you missed the really big one:
> (4) User-definable Type system, with context-sensitive operators and
> It's our type system which makes us an ORDBMS. The other things are
> largely decorations.
Again, I don't see what is particularly "object-oriented" about PG's
extensible type system.
I can see that "object-oriented" has been redefined so much that it can
mean anything. So, I suppose it doesn't hurt to leave it in the
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Alejandro Carrillo||Date: 2012-04-28 22:35:11|
|Subject: Re: Próximo evento de Comunidades PostgreSQL|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2012-04-27 07:34:14|
|Subject: Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?|