Re: Bug tracker tool we need

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jay Levitt <jay(dot)levitt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug tracker tool we need
Date: 2012-04-18 14:19:37
Message-ID: 1334758777.29544.16.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On ons, 2012-04-18 at 13:33 +0300, Alex Shulgin wrote:
> I wonder why do people keep complaining how their bug tracker of
> choice sucks, instead of doing something about that.

Lack of time, and to some degree a lack of clarity of what they want out
of the thing. (Most people are very clear on what they don't want.)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-04-18 14:27:08 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't override arguments set via options with positional argumen
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-04-18 14:15:03 Re: Bug tracker tool we need