John DeSoi <jd(at)icx(dot)net> writes:
> What version of OS X are you running? I thought I replicated the
> problem after upgrading to 10.2.8, but now I'm not certain I ran initdb
> again (I may have just rebuilt beta 5). So possibly it could be a
> difference between 10.2.6 and 10.2.8. If not, I have no clue. I'll
> report back if I find anything.
I'm running 10.2.6 (a pretty fresh install, see prior bellyaching about
hardware problems with my laptop ;-)). IIRC, someone else reported
success with a clean 10.2.8 installation in this thread. I have also
checked PG against a 10.3 beta recently, and so have other people.
It's fairly likely that there are problems with 10.1, if anyone still
uses that, but I have no reason to think that PG 7.4 will fail with
either 10.2.* or 10.3.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alessio Bragadini||Date: 2003-10-29 11:45:42|
|Subject: Re: Call for port reports|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2003-10-29 04:17:11|
|Subject: Re: pg_ctl reports succes when start fails|
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: ruhunu Gamarala||Date: 2003-10-29 09:05:51|
|Previous:||From: Aleksey||Date: 2003-10-29 03:05:55|
|Subject: JDBC DatabaseMetaData problem|