| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: patch: autocomplete for functions |
| Date: | 2012-03-26 16:49:12 |
| Message-ID: | 1332780552.3800.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On mån, 2012-03-19 at 15:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> This connects somewhat to the discussions we've had in the past about
> trying to get not-intended-for-public-use functions out of the
> standard search path. Not that you want to put a full visibility
> check into the tab-completion query, but if it could simply exclude a
> "pg_private" namespace, that probably wouldn't be too expensive.
I wonder if this could be worked out using pg_depend. For example, give
me all functions that are not referenced by some object in pg_catalog.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2012-03-26 16:51:41 | Re: Odd out of memory problem. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-03-26 16:43:44 | Re: Odd out of memory problem. |