On mån, 2012-03-12 at 13:04 -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
> On the more constructive side, if I were to till the fields to change
> this aspect of the optimizer, is there any interest in rectifying the
> operator-function confusion?

I once proposed to do that [1], but there was not much enthusiasm
elsewhere.  I still think it'd be worthwhile, for the reasons you
mentioned.  But it would be a lot of detail work.


[1] http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1309640525(dot)26660(dot)22(dot)camel(at)vanquo(dot)pezone(dot)net

In response to

• Re: query planner does not canonicalize infix operators at 2012-03-12 20:04:49 from Daniel Farina

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Joachim Wieland	Date: 2012-03-13 03:35:52
	Subject: Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2012-03-13 03:10:37
	Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and statistics