Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun feb 27 20:54:41 -0300 2012:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:30:36 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Ugh ... if that's currently allowed, we definitely need to fix it.
> > Btw, whats the danger youre seing?
> Well, I'm not sure that it would actively break anything, but we
> definitely meant to disallow the case. Also, I seem to recall some
> places that intuit a relation's shared marker in the opposite direction
> (if it's in pg_global it must be shared), and that could definitely
> cause issues if we treat a rel as shared when it isn't.
The list of shared rels is hardcoded -- see IsSharedRelation.
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2012-02-28 02:18:22|
|Subject: Re: Trigger execution role (was: Triggers with DO functionality)|
|Previous:||From: firstname.lastname@example.org||Date: 2012-02-28 00:29:20|
|Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11|