Excerpts from Noah Misch's message of jue ene 26 12:00:49 -0300 2012:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:39:56PM -0500, Noah Misch wrote:
> > In any event, the patch needed a rebase, so I've attached it rebased and with
> > that comment edited to reference ri_GenerateQualCollation(), that being the
> > most-relevant source for the assumption in question.
> Commit 9d35116611e6a1fc10f2298944fbf0e4e1a826be invalidated the test case hunks
> again. We'll need to either remove the test cases, as Robert chose to do for
> that other patch, or bolster them per
Committed, removing the tests.
I also chose to update catversion, even though I can't figure out how to
make a Constraint node be stored anywhere. Maybe it's not even
possible, but then I thought maybe I'm just lacking imagination.
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 2012-02-27 22:49:04|
|Subject: Re: How to know a table has been modified?|
|Previous:||From: Miroslav Šimulčík||Date: 2012-02-27 21:50:03|
|Subject: Re: default values in inheritance hierarchies|