Re: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: depesz <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks
Date: 2012-02-27 13:17:21
Message-ID: 1330348608-sup-7152@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from hubert depesz lubaczewski's message of lun feb 27 10:02:57 -0300 2012:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 03:04:28PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I rechecked Depesz's article -
> > http://www.depesz.com/2011/07/01/waiting-for-9-2-not-valid-checks/
> >
> > The behave of current HEAD is different than behave described in article.
> >
> > "alter table a validate constraint a_a_check" needs a access exclusive
> > locks and blocks table modification - I tested inserts.

> yes, looks like we have revert to access exclusive lock:

See commits
2c3d9db56d5d49bdc777b174982251c01348e3d8
and
a195e3c34f1eeb6a607c342121edf48e49067ea9

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-02-27 13:26:09 Re: restrict modification of column values in BR triggers
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-02-27 13:08:04 Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results