Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Triggers with DO functionality

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Triggers with DO functionality
Date: 2012-02-26 13:41:32
Message-ID: 1330263692.32452.31.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2012-02-24 at 13:55 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > By default, a trigger function runs as the table owner, ie it's
> implicitly SEC DEF
> > to the table owner.
>  
> Really?  That's certainly what I would *want*, but it's not what I've
> seen. 

Yes, you're right, that was my recollection as well.  I was doubly
confused.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2012-02-26 14:04:28
Subject: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2012-02-26 12:53:53
Subject: Re: leakproof

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group