Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ISO8601 nitpicking

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ISO8601 nitpicking
Date: 2012-02-24 12:45:25
Message-ID: 1330087525.32452.10.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tor, 2012-02-23 at 23:41 -0800, Daniel Farina wrote:
> As it turns out, evidence would suggests that the "ISO" output in
> Postgres isn't, unless there's an ISO standard for date and time that
> is referring to other than 8601.

Yes, ISO 9075, the SQL standard.  This particular issue has been
discussed many times; see the archives.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rosario BordaDate: 2012-02-24 12:47:01
Subject: Format of raw files
Previous:From: Daniel FarinaDate: 2012-02-24 12:36:39
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements normalization: re-review

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group