On tor, 2012-02-23 at 23:41 -0800, Daniel Farina wrote:
> As it turns out, evidence would suggests that the "ISO" output in
> Postgres isn't, unless there's an ISO standard for date and time that
> is referring to other than 8601.

Yes, ISO 9075, the SQL standard.  This particular issue has been
discussed many times; see the archives.

In response to

• ISO8601 nitpicking at 2012-02-24 07:41:09 from Daniel Farina

Responses

• Re: ISO8601 nitpicking at 2012-02-24 18:40:04 from Daniel Farina

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Rosario Borda	Date: 2012-02-24 12:47:01
	Subject: Format of raw files
Previous:	From: Daniel Farina	Date: 2012-02-24 12:36:39
	Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements normalization: re-review