Re: Sanity Check?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sanity Check?
Date: 2005-07-28 00:12:10
Message-ID: 13285.1122509530@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Why does the sanity check test start with a VACUUM? Why not a VACUUM
> FULL?

The test predates the existence of VACUUM FULL ;-); so that's what it
did originally. I think I deliberately left it as-is during the 7.2
devel cycle, so that the new lazy-vacuum code would get exercised.

I don't see any strong reason to change it now ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-07-28 00:22:54 Autovacuum to-do list
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2005-07-28 00:06:46 Re: Some new list.c primitives