Re: Review of patch renaming constraints

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Review of patch renaming constraints
Date: 2012-02-01 20:32:29
Message-ID: 1328128349.28270.18.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2012-01-12 at 22:43 -0600, Joshua Berkus wrote:
> Most normal uses of alter table ... rename constraint ... worked
> normally. However, the patch does not deal correctly with constraints
> which are not inherited, such as primary key constraints:

New patch which works around that issue.

Attachment Content-Type Size
rename-constraint.patch text/x-patch 15.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Duncan Rance 2012-02-01 20:43:48 Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-02-01 20:02:45 Re: how to create a non-inherited CHECK constraint in CREATE TABLE