Excerpts from Alex Shulgin's message of jue ene 19 15:41:54 -0300 2012:
> PS: yes, I could just copy message id from the sent mail in my MUA, but
> I like to make sure links I post aren't broke, so still I'll need to
> wait until archives catches up to double check.
I find this a bad excuse. If you're a pgsql-hackers regular, then you
already know your posts are going to show up with the correct
message-id. The links might be broken for the next 10 minutes, but
links that stay broken for a longer period than that should be rare.
Surely you don't change your MUA once a month or anything.
I know I don't waste time waiting for my posts to show up in the
archives before adding links to the CF app.
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2012-01-19 19:04:46|
|Subject: Re: Review of patch renaming constraints|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-01-19 19:00:20|
|Subject: Re: Re: Add minor version to v3 protocol to allow changes
without breaking backwards compatibility|