On sön, 2012-01-15 at 08:14 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> It would possibly have some documentary value too. Just looking very
> quickly at Peter's patch, I don't really understand his assertion that
> this would significantly butcher the code. The worst effect would be
> that in a few cases we'd have to break up multiple declarations where
> one of the variables was in this class. That doesn't seem like a
> tragedy.
Well, I'll prepare a patch like that and then you can judge.
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Alvaro Herrera | Date: 2012-01-18 19:17:36 |
| Subject: Re: Command Triggers |
| Previous: | From: Peter Eisentraut | Date: 2012-01-18 19:15:52 |
| Subject: Re: lots of unused variable warnings in assert-free builds |