Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of mié ene 18 16:03:29 -0300 2012:
> At the moment the trigger functions are called from
> standard_ProcessUtility() and are given the parse tree as handed over to
> that function, before the parse analysis.
> We can easily enough copy the parse tree and do another round of parse
> analysis on it only when some command triggers are going to get called.
> Is the cost of doing so acceptable?
Huh, isn't it simpler to just pass the triggers the parse tree *after*
parse analysis? I don't understand what you're doing here.
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-01-18 19:21:03|
|Subject: Re: lots of unused variable warnings in assert-free builds |
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2012-01-18 19:16:56|
|Subject: Re: lots of unused variable warnings in assert-free builds|