| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits |
| Date: | 2008-12-31 18:25:34 |
| Message-ID: | 13242.1230747934@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2008/12/31 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
>> Maybe we could have a separate function which returned the info in
>> various columns (OUT params). Maybe it would be useful to normalize the
>> info as reported the buildfarm, which right now is a bit ad-hoc.
> All should be GUC read only variables - It is cheep.
Not as cheap as a single added function. If we need to provide these
fields broken out --- and no one has demonstrated any need to do so ---
then I'd support Alvaro's suggestion.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-12-31 18:27:10 | SET TRANSACTION and SQL Standard |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-12-31 18:21:34 | lazy_truncate_heap() |