Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: "'Larry Rosenman'" <lrosenman(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?
Date: 2006-01-20 05:51:58
Message-ID: 13236.1137736318@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Looks like we're fairly well covered on freebsd already. Are you
>> willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?

> What were you thinking?

[ shrug... ] Anything you don't see paired with amd64 on the buildfarm
roster is OK by me ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2006-01-20 13:58:16 Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2006-01-20 05:36:50 Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?