--On Wednesday, June 25, 2003 22:58:39 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> One way I could imagine doing it is to split log_min_messages into
>>> three variables, along the lines of "minimum message level to produce
>>> a TERSE report", "minimum message level to produce a DEFAULT report",
>>> and "minimum message level to produce a VERBOSE report". This seems
>>> a bit inelegant though. Better ideas anyone?
>> I doubt someone would want to control terse/default/verbose at various
>> levels --- I assume they would just want all their messages to be
>> terse/default/ or verbose.
> <shrug> That would certainly be the least work to implement. I was
> fishing to see if anyone felt that more is needed.
hooks for the next release after we all get some experience with this?
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2003-06-26 03:42:39|
|Subject: recursive queries|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-06-26 02:58:39|
|Subject: Re: Updating psql for features of new FE/BE protocol |