Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq

From: Alexander Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq
Date: 2011-11-24 12:33:41
Message-ID: 1322137763-sup-9421@moon
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of Thu Nov 24 13:57:17 +0200 2011:
>
> I think it would be really weird not to support user:pw(at)host:port. You can presumably also support the JDBC style for backward compatibility, but I don't think we should adopt that syntax as project standard.

Well, I don't believe JDBC syntax is ideal either, but I don't recall any better option proposed in the original discussion: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg01945.php

Do you suggest that we should reconsider?

--
Alex

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2011-11-24 12:58:27 Re: Time bug with small years
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-11-24 11:57:17 Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq