Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq

From: Alexander Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq
Date: 2011-11-24 12:33:41
Message-ID: 1322137763-sup-9421@moon (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of Thu Nov 24 13:57:17 +0200 2011:
> 
> I think it would be really weird not to support user:pw(at)host:port.  You can presumably also support the JDBC style for backward compatibility, but I don't think we should adopt that syntax as project standard.

Well, I don't believe JDBC syntax is ideal either, but I don't recall any better option proposed in the original discussion: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg01945.php

Do you suggest that we should reconsider?

--
Alex

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Richard HuxtonDate: 2011-11-24 12:58:27
Subject: Re: Time bug with small years
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-11-24 11:57:17
Subject: Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group