Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: btvacuumpage useless "orig_blkno"

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: btvacuumpage useless "orig_blkno"
Date: 2011-11-21 22:19:13
Message-ID: 1321913906-sup-7098@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Simon Riggs's message of lun nov 21 19:11:21 -0300 2011:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > I just noticed that btvacuumpage has two BlockNumber parameters -- blkno
> > and orig_blkno.  The only caller passes them as the same value; the
> > header comments state that blkno would be different when recursing, but
> > actually the function implements recursion internally by way of a cute
> > "goto" trick.  So it seems to me that the orig_blkno parameter is
> > useless -- we could just remove it.
> >
> > Unless I'm completely missing something?
> 
> tail recursion - read comments at bottom of the function

Right, but we don't need to pass the value as a parameter, we can just
save it at the start of the function, as my proposed patch does, right?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-11-21 22:55:18
Subject: Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2011-11-21 22:11:21
Subject: Re: btvacuumpage useless "orig_blkno"

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group