| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | depesz(at)depesz(dot)com |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL - General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? |
| Date: | 2011-10-30 21:28:52 |
| Message-ID: | 1320010137.23279.4.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
[Moving to pgsql-general]
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 07:24 +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> we'd like to upgrade to newest 8.3, and we're on 8.3.11 _id, but it
> looks like 8.3.11 is the newest version of 8.3 built with integer
> datetimes:
> http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64-id/repoview/
>
> Is there any reason for this, and will there be any newer versions
> built with integer datetimes?
>
I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of
request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages
quite easily, though.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | daflmx | 2011-10-31 01:45:41 | |
| Previous Message | Alexander Farber | 2011-10-30 12:53:53 | Re: From select to delete |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-10-31 12:36:40 | Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-10-30 18:50:55 | Re: old "whats new" link |