> Hmm, maybe I spoke too soon. With 9000 child tables I get a profile
> like this:
Well, the 9000-table-test-case was meant to check the difference in
performance with/without the patch... I don't see the reason for trying
to optimize such an unrealistic case.
BTW can someone explain to me which are the cases where the
patch actually helps?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-10-29 17:31:32|
|Subject: Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ... |
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-10-29 17:16:44|
|Subject: Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...|