Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of jue sep 29 09:56:09 -0300 2011:
> Thinking some more, I don't need to know the data directory while the
> server is down --- I already am starting it. pg_upgrade starts both old
> and new servers during its check phase, and it could look up the
> data_directory GUC variable and use that value when accessing files.
> That would work for old and new servers. However, I assume that is
> something we would not backpatch to 9.1.
Why not? We've supported separate data/config dirs for a long time now,
so it seems to me that pg_upgrade not coping with them is a bug. If
pg_upgrade starts postmaster, it seems simple to grab the data_directory
setting, is it not?
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Florian Pflug||Date: 2011-09-29 13:59:05|
|Subject: Re: Feature proposal: www_fdw|
|Previous:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2011-09-29 13:39:24|
|Subject: Re: Does RelCache/SysCache shrink except when relations are deleted?|