Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Isolation tests still falling over routinely

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Isolation tests still falling over routinely
Date: 2011-09-21 02:04:45
Message-ID: 1316570348-sup-317@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of mar sep 20 22:51:39 -0300 2011:

> If I remember right, Alvaro chose these timings to balance run time
> against chance of failure.  Unless we want to remove these deadlock
> handling tests or ignore failures (which both seem like bad ideas to
> me), I think we need to bump the long timings by an order of
> magnitude and just concede that those tests run for a while.

The main problem I have is that I haven't found a way to reproduce the
problems in my machine.  I was playing with modifying the way the error
messages are reported, but that ended up unfinished in a local branch.

I'll give it a go once more and see if I can commit so that buildfarm
tells us if it works or not.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-09-21 02:18:45
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN and nfiltered, take two
Previous:From: Dan McGeeDate: 2011-09-21 01:54:20
Subject: [PATCH] POC: inline int4 comparison in tuplesort

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group