Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2
Date: 2011-09-10 21:00:20
Message-ID: 1315688421.1296.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On lör, 2011-09-10 at 23:29 +0300, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> I, for one, do use alpha tarballs on my dev machines (when working on
> apps that use PostgreSQL). It gives me a concrete schedule to update
> them that's not too frequent and I can tell whether they need updating
> just by glancing at the version string.
> 
> If I was using git, I'd probably have some machines lagging hopelessly
> behind and always confused about which version is which. 

Well, that's another point.  If you're doing constant testing, do we
really want you testing code that is several weeks old?  If you
discovered an issue, the first response would most likely be, upgrade to
the latest state of development.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-09-10 21:03:15
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2
Previous:From: Joshua BerkusDate: 2011-09-10 20:47:57
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group