Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers ML <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2
Date: 2011-09-10 19:50:15
Message-ID: 1315684218.1296.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2011-09-06 at 13:38 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> 2011/9/6 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> > Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> >> Is there a plan to wrap up 9.2 Alpha 1 before the next commitfest?
> >
> > We talked about it on core and no one seems interested in doing the
> > packaging.  :-(
> 
> Well I don't particularly mind pushing a tag and bundling it, but I
> guess the question is whether we actually want to do alpha releases at
> all.  I assume that core's reluctance to do this stems from being
> dubious about its value, which seems like something that we should
> discuss more broadly.

One point, which was already raised last year around this time, was that
it does seem weird to have alphas for release N+1 while beta for release
N is still going on.  This year the start of N+1 was even earlier than
last year.



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-09-10 19:52:29
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-09-10 19:44:16
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group