Re: warm standby - apply wal archives

From: MirrorX <mirrorx(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: warm standby - apply wal archives
Date: 2011-09-05 17:32:11
Message-ID: 1315243931056-4771295.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

thx a lot for your answer.

actually DRBD is the solution i am trying to avoid, since i think the
performance is degrading a lot (i ve used it in the past). and also i have
serious doubts if the data is corrupted in case of the master's failure, if
not all blocks have been replicated to they secondary. has anyone faced this
situation? any comments on that? thx in advance

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/warm-standby-apply-wal-archives-tp4770567p4771295.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2011-09-05 17:52:16 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem
Previous Message Andreas Kretschmer 2011-09-05 16:53:38 Re: warm standby - apply wal archives