Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress
Date: 2011-09-02 13:44:42
Message-ID: 1314971082.29051.0.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2011-09-02 at 11:01 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> What about logging it with a lower level, e.g. NOTICE instead of the
> current LOG? If that's not a solution then a new GUC is needed I
> guess.

Changing the log level is not the appropriate solution.  Make it a
configuration parameter.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-09-02 14:13:19
Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress
Previous:From: Tomas VondraDate: 2011-09-02 13:25:09
Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group