On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 09:20 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 31.08.2011 09:14, Jeff Davis wrote:
> > First, a range is really a set. So if we take '[1,10)'::int4range and
> > cast that to numrange, we end up moving from a set of exactly 9 elements
> > to a set of an infinite number of elements. Going the other way is
> > probably worse.
> Can you only provide casts that make sense, like between int4 and
> numeric range types, and leave out the ones that don't?
There are certainly some casts that make sense, like
int4range->int8range. Do you think int4range->numrange also makes sense?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2011-08-31 15:20:13|
|Subject: rename index fields bug|
|Previous:||From: Joe Abbate||Date: 2011-08-31 14:42:44|
|Subject: Re: Comparing two PostgreSQL databases -- order of pg_dump