Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: VACUUM FULL FREEZE is unsafe

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Thomas F(dot)O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL FREEZE is unsafe
Date: 2004-11-28 00:40:43
Message-ID: 13147.1101602443@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Thomas F.O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> writes:
> So why not have VACUUM FULL FREEZE just do what you propose: VACUUM 
> FULL then VACUUM FREEZE.

The objective is to make it more safe, not less so.  Doing that would
require rewriting a whole bunch of code, which I am not up for at this
stage of the release cycle.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-11-28 01:21:42
Subject: Fix for NLS in pgport
Previous:From: Thomas F.O'ConnellDate: 2004-11-27 23:39:35
Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL FREEZE is unsafe

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group